Vassar Libraries' guide to evaluating sources
ACT UP method: Author, Currency, Truth, Unbias, Privilege
Labaree, Robert V. Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper: Detecting Bias. USC Libraries.
Introduction to Lateral Reading (aka, going to the source, or as close as possible.)
Journal & Article Evaluation Checklist (great for your own writing too)
Quick Tips
Evaluation Criteria
| Relevancy |
|
|
Author Expertise & Discipline
|
|
|
Source Type |
|
|
Currency & Publication Date |
|
|
Evidence, Objectivity & Bias |
|
A number of metrics analyze citation counts, i.e. the number of times a source has been cited by other researchers.
For more information see, Research Impact Metrics: University of Michigan Library.
Below is a modified, abbreviated framework for tracking research outputs to locate indicators that demonstrate evidence of research impact.
|
Advancement of Knowledge What was created by the research study? How has the research output and activities been used? |
|
|
Community Benefit How has community health been enhanced as a result of this research? |
|
|
Clinical Implementation Has the research been adopted in clinical activities or applications? |
|
|
Economic Benefit What economic benefits were produced from result of research outputs and/or activities? |
|
|
|
Bernard Becker Medical Library, Washington University School of Medicine.
The BEAM model provides a framework for identifying how you might use a source in your own research. However, BEAM can also be used during the research process, for distilling a body of work, or identifying gaps (i.e. does one of the BEAM components need to be better addressed?)
